Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Samuel Cartinhour
About
- Username
- Samuel Cartinhour
- Joined
- Visits
- 43
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I believe that moving the checkbox (with the logic inverted) to the Darks panel is the best solution. My suggested label would be "Using pre-calibrated Darks". I hope the script developer considers these changes. But even if they don't, I want to t…
-
Our posts are crossing -- yes, I completely agree with your proposed addition to the tool tips.
-
Adam, I think the problem is really entirely with the label and the checkbox location. It presents a binary choice (please subtract bias vs. I've already subtracted bias) at the global level. Neither choice is relevant to the user who has a bias-le…
-
Hi Adam, I think I can be more specific now about my confusion -- perhaps shared by others -- A check mark next to "Calibrate Master Dark" is a request to the script to do a specific operation (subtract the bias). The absence of a check mark means:…
-
Hi Adam, I initially interpreted "Calibrate Master Dark" to mean: please subtract a master bias from the master dark that I am providing, or subtract it from the master dark that WBPP will construct for me from the dark files I provide. But since …
-
I think I understand part of what you're saying. Since there are no bias frames in your example, the master dark can't/won't be calibrated. That checkbox is in fact greyed out in your video. I found that it can't be modified unless you first check t…
-
I listened again just to confirm -- between 7:25 and 7:35, this is what I'm referring to (very roughly transcribed): "I should tell you, though, that I do have this -- it doesn't matter -- I have this calibrate master darks thing, but there's no bi…